Thread: Who knew? Physical camera controls are great… for the most part
View Single Post
  #1  
Old 10-03-2024, 10:09 AM
phillynews215's Avatar
phillynews215 phillynews215 is offline   Thread Starter  
I'm A Community Feed Poster

  puertorico
 
Join Date: October 11th, 2009
Posts: 13,274
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
phillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuff


View phillynews215's Profile   Edit Options Edit Profile Picture View phillynews215's Photo Album Add phillynews215's to Your Contacts Show Groups Edit Avatar Subscribed Threads Private Messages
Default Who knew? Physical camera controls are great… for the most part
It started as a rumor: Apple might add yet another button to the iPhone 16 series. At first, I thought it sounded like a terrible idea. Why would I need another way to control the camera when I can snap a picture with the volume button? Why not use the already-existing Action Button? And would I get used to swiping a capacitive button to change camera settings?

I was ready to roast the Camera Control before I ever tried it. Now that I’ve been using the iPhone 16 Pro, however, I’ve begun to change my tune. It’s not perfect, but Apple’s Camera Control shows how helpful physical controls can be when using your phone as your primary camera.




More...
Reply With Quote