View Single Post
  #1  
Old 10-11-2024, 07:25 PM
phillynews215's Avatar
phillynews215 phillynews215 is offline   Thread Starter  
I'm A Community Feed Poster

  puertorico
 
Join Date: October 11th, 2009
Posts: 13,248
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
phillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuff


View phillynews215's Profile   Edit Options Edit Profile Picture View phillynews215's Photo Album Add phillynews215's to Your Contacts Show Groups Edit Avatar Subscribed Threads Private Messages
Default Poll result: Android runs circles around iPhones when it comes to USB-C

Like any well-adjusted technology enthusiast, you’re probably a big fan of USB-C: reversible, elegant, ubiquitous. Its adoption has been so lauded that’s its little wonder we can’t help but turn our faces in disgust whenever we’re forced to deal with legacy micro-USB (and do not even get us started on mini). But for as much as we like about it, USB-C is a lot more than just a super-handy physical connector, and depending on the devices we’re using with it, there can be a lot of (sometimes confusing) differences about the features it supports.

That’s true not just across manufacturers, but even within the same hardware families — just look at data speeds on Apple’s iPhone 15 and 16 series, where the lower-model phones are stuck with 480Mbps over USB 2.0, while the Pro editions get USB 3.1 Gen 2×1 and blistering 10Gbps performance. That’s an order of magnitude improvement, but you wouldn’t have any real sense of the potential there by just looking at their USB-C ports alone. And this isn’t even touching on differing levels of charging support.




More...
Reply With Quote