View Single Post
  #1  
Old 11-19-2024, 11:20 AM
phillynews215's Avatar
phillynews215 phillynews215 is offline   Thread Starter  
I'm A Community Feed Poster

  puertorico
 
Join Date: October 11th, 2009
Posts: 13,304
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
phillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuff


View phillynews215's Profile   Edit Options Edit Profile Picture View phillynews215's Photo Album Add phillynews215's to Your Contacts Show Groups Edit Avatar Subscribed Threads Private Messages
Default Just how thin could the iPhone 17 Air be? A new leak tells us

Credit: Ryan Haines / Android Authority


  • The iPhone 17 Air, featuring a 6.6-inch display and a mind-blowingly slim build, may replace the Plus variant in 2025.
  • A fresh report suggests this model will be around 6mm thick and dethrone the 6.9mm iPhone 6 as Apple’s thinnest smartphone yet.
  • Next year’s Air model will likely lack some of the higher-end features, as its slim form factor will be its unique selling point.

Recently, Apple has been taking advantage of its efficient silicon to slim down its devices. Just a few months ago, the company revealed its thinnest device yet, the 5.1mm iPad Pro M4. It similarly has been overhauling its Macs now that their Intel era is over. The next device to receive a significant design overhaul may be the iPhone. According to multiple rumors, the Cupertino firm plans to replace next year’s Plus variant with a 6.6-inch iPhone 17 Air, and we now know how thin it could be.

Apple analyst Jeff Pu “agreed with the recent chatter of a 6mm thickness ultra-slim design of the iPhone 17 Slim model,” states MacRumors. If this turns out to be accurate, the iPhone 17 Air will dethrone the 6.9mm iPhone 6 as Apple’s thinnest phone to date.




More...
Reply With Quote