View Single Post
  #1  
Old 12-23-2024, 12:22 PM
phillynews215's Avatar
phillynews215 phillynews215 is offline   Thread Starter  
I'm A Community Feed Poster

  puertorico
 
Join Date: October 11th, 2009
Posts: 13,273
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
phillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuffphillynews215 Knows Their Stuff


View phillynews215's Profile   Edit Options Edit Profile Picture View phillynews215's Photo Album Add phillynews215's to Your Contacts Show Groups Edit Avatar Subscribed Threads Private Messages
Default Qi2 wireless charging confusion resolved: No magnets, no logo

Credit: Rita El Khoury / Android Authority


  • Recent online discussions have questioned whether the Qi2 wireless charging logo requires the device to contain magnets.
  • The debate arose after an outdated Wireless Power Consortium (WPC) document caused some confusion.
  • It has now been clarified that devices must have a Magnetic Power Profile to be Qi2-certified.

There’s recently been some confusion around Qi2 wireless charging. The debate was about whether a product could feature the official Qi2 logo without supporting the Magnetic Power Profile — one of the key upgrades introduced in the latest wireless charging standard. We can now dismiss any doubt and confirm that the Qi2 logo means there are magnets in the device.

There are various aspects of how the confusion arose, but Android Authority*contributor Mishaal Rahman clarified the situation succinctly in a*mea culpa post on X (formerly Twitter).*He acknowledged that earlier reports, including his own, suggested that products could bear the Qi2 logo even if they didn’t support magnetic charging. These claims were based on an outdated document from the Wireless Power Consortium (WPC), which has since been removed.




More...
Reply With Quote