![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Before I go any further, I need to address Googles intentions with this change. Is Google restricting what permissions sideloaded apps can obtain because they actually want to protect users, or are they doing it to keep people on the Google Play Store? Given the many court cases and legal battles that Google has been caught up with in recent years, its easy to be skeptical that Google has good intentions with this change. However, its important to consider two facts. More... |
![]() ![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FTC cracks down on Genshin Impact gacha loot box practices | phillynews215 | Web Host News | 0 | 01-17-2025 06:57 PM |
| US cracks down on North Korean IT worker army with more sanctions | phillynews215 | Web Host News | 0 | 01-16-2025 02:50 PM |
| Play Protect could let users rescan apps without uninstalling offending app | phillynews215 | Digital Scoop | 0 | 12-05-2024 10:04 PM |
| FTC cracks down on subscription tricks with click-to-cancel rule | phillynews215 | Digital Scoop | 0 | 10-16-2024 01:41 PM |
| Google Play Store makes searching for apps harder on tablets | phillynews215 | Digital Scoop | 0 | 10-03-2024 05:36 AM |